Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 21:38:00 +0200 From: "Reko Turja" <reko.turja@liukuma.net> To: <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Poudriere building far more ports than it should Message-ID: <B9CF19AEA7594349BAF53E1F901D9CE9@RIVENDELL> In-Reply-To: <20181114192628.kbeotxvpxxulu3in@privacychain.ch> References: <7B44FD5ED75B4BCB8E53B611BE045D11@RIVENDELL> <20181114175544.GA3692@wstan> <6A6585E03E754B0B860F64D2A5AA160E@RIVENDELL> <20181114192628.kbeotxvpxxulu3in@privacychain.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----Original Message----- From: AlexandreC. Guimarães Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 9:26 PM > Do you mean the OPTIONS you previously set were not honoured by poudriere? > > Just in case, poudriere does not `read` OPTIONS and/or other things like > make.conf from the default location but from /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/* Yes, I copied over my make.conf, my src.conf and then /var/db/ports/ to options. And as I said in previous then douplechecked with "poudriere options -c..." What I can understand is that poudriere brought for example every single Imagick dependency, even if I just use a selected few. Of course if everything is as intended and the packages install without any extra dependencies I don't need, I'm happy. Just haven't got time yet to check if the packages I've built "behave", been too busy rebuilding my home firewall/gateway to incorporate the delivery of the packages to intended targets :) Mostly asking to make sure if this is something to be expected, glitch in some ports or possibly a bug. -Reko
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B9CF19AEA7594349BAF53E1F901D9CE9>