From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 23 13:45:08 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7B816A418 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:45:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from mx4.netclusive.de (mx4.netclusive.de [89.110.132.136]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A3413C45A for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:45:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (Fddc5.f.ppp-pool.de [195.4.221.197]) (Authenticated sender: ncf1534p2) by mx4.netclusive.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51C25E00F5 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:45:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: by nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (Postfix, from userid 8) id 8187315217; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:42:08 +0200 (CEST) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Path: not-for-mail From: Christian Baer Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:42:08 +0200 (CEST) Organization: Convenimus Projekt Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: <48ce8d530709211747s615bc16by5766441066f19237@mail.gmail.com> <7CDF3AD1-DE13-46F6-A84F-B26FA3F97032@dragffy.com> <200709221918.53961.wundram@beenic.net> <46F66AB6.1090500@mikestammer.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: sunny.rz1.convenimus.net X-Trace: nermal.rz1.convenimus.net 1190554928 83489 192.168.100.5 (23 Sep 2007 13:42:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@convenimus.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:42:08 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD/6.2-RELEASE-p7 (sparc64)) Subject: Re: migrate from postfix to qmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:45:08 -0000 On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 08:31:34 -0500 Eric wrote: >> Don't tell me, tell Dan Berstein (happy hunting): >> http://cr.yp.to/qmail/guarantee.html >> Observe point 5. > DJB has not honored at least one vulnerability in qmail. read the link i > posted early in this thread and decide for yourself. theres a word for > people who say one thing and do another... Why do you think I put the "happy hunting" there? Didn't travel quite as sarcastic as the smile on my face when I wrote it. :-) I don't like qmail much and I certainly don't like DJB's attitude in many cases. He had a few good ideas however and it certainly is not my part to try and take that away from him. Besides, I wasn't trying to prove anything about qmail being good or bad but just something about the configuration and the parsing. I haven't looked at qmail in years. Funny that the Version is still the same as when I used it (that could well be 10 years ago). Today I don't really care if qmail is secure. That would be a typical case of SEP. :-) Regards Chris