Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:46:13 +0200 From: Thomas Quinot <thomas@cuivre.fr.eu.org> To: Nick Hibma <n_hibma@van-laarhoven.org> Cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com>, Thomas Quinot <thomas@cuivre.fr.eu.org>, "freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org" <freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: xpt_bus_deregister Message-ID: <20020411154613.A84638@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <004501c1e15e$fdbbc000$7800420a@vanlaarhoven.org>; from n_hibma@van-laarhoven.org on Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 03:44:24PM %2B0200 References: <200204111316.g3BDG8939967@aslan.scsiguy.com> <004501c1e15e$fdbbc000$7800420a@vanlaarhoven.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 2002-04-11, Nick Hibma écrivait :
> But in the case of the ATAPI/CAM layer he wants to use it to detach the SIM.
No no, I think there is some confusion here.
The SIM detach function is called by the underlying ATAPI code, /not/ by
the async callback. The issue is that before calling xpt_bus_deregister
in the detach function, I also need to /remove/ the async callback for
the ref count to correctly drop to 0.
Thomas.
--
Thomas.Quinot@Cuivre.FR.EU.ORG
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020411154613.A84638>