From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 15 08:58:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2532C16A4BF for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 08:58:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from datasphereweb.com (12-212-67-226.client.attbi.com [12.212.67.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 664D943FA3 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 08:58:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ryallsd@datasphereweb.com) Received: (qmail 79946 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2003 15:58:08 -0000 Received: from evrtwa1-ar17-4-47-114-001.evrtwa1.dsl-verizon.net (HELO bartxp) (4.47.114.1) by datasphereweb.com with SMTP; 15 Sep 2003 15:58:08 -0000 From: "Derrick Ryalls" To: "'FreeBSD'" Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 08:57:57 -0700 Message-ID: <011801c37ba2$251753b0$0200a8c0@bartxp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-Reply-To: <15590000.1063504943@[192.168.0.5]> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Not quite mail relay X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 15:58:10 -0000 I think I figured it out. The qmail-smtpd.c patch for SMTP AUTH had an exploit. It did require authentications, but it didn't care what credentials you threw at it, so long as you sent something. On that note, does anyone know of a way to get SMTP AUTH working with qmail without being an accidental relay?