From owner-freebsd-arch  Mon Nov 11  1:16:20 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3B637B401
	for <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 01:16:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vbook.express.ru (asplinux.ru [195.133.213.194])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4A743E6E
	for <arch@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 01:16:18 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from vova@sw.ru)
Received: from vova by vbook.express.ru with local (Exim 4.10)
	id 18BAfy-0000EI-00; Mon, 11 Nov 2002 12:16:10 +0300
Subject: Re: NO_WERROR and the kernel
From: "Vladimir B. " Grebenschikov <vova@sw.ru>
To: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Cc: imp@bsdimp.com, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <200210262214.PAA12021@windsor.research.att.com>
References: <200210262214.PAA12021@windsor.research.att.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Organization: SWsoft Inc.
Message-Id: <1037006168.686.6.camel@vbook>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.1.2 (Preview Release)
Date: 11 Nov 2002 12:16:09 +0300
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-arch.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-arch>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-arch>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

=F7 Sun, 27.10.2002, =D7 02:14, Bill Fenner =CE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1=CC:
> That patch adds pretty much exactly what
>=20
> | Revision 1.16 / Mon Jul 22 00:15:01 2002 UTC (3 months ago) by peter=20
> | Changes since 1.15: +0 -5 lines
> |=20
> | The transition time for -Werror has been gone for a while.  We are now
> | sufficiently clean that we can fix any new problems or mark individual
> | files as not being ready for -Werror.
>=20
> removed.  I think that it was to handle the case where people still had
> NO_WERROR for userland but the kernel was warning-free and wanted to stay
> that way.

Is LINT now Werror proof ?

I have found that=20

options         SC_DFLT_FONT
makeoptions     SC_DFLT_FONT=3Dcp850

make a lot of warnings, and can't be compiled with -Werror.

>   Bill

--=20
Vladimir B. Grebenschikov <vova@sw.ru>
SWsoft Inc.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message