From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 28 19:27:41 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5686732; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 19:27:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stefan@fafoe.narf.at) Received: from fep12.mx.upcmail.net (fep12.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9388E27CC; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 19:27:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edge03.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.238]) by viefep12-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.05.05 201-2260-151-110-20120111) with ESMTP id <20131028192733.KHD985.viefep12-int.chello.at@edge03.upcmail.net>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:27:33 +0100 Received: from mole.fafoe.narf.at ([80.109.55.137]) by edge03.upcmail.net with edge id ijTY1m01A2xdvHc03jTY8C; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:27:33 +0100 X-SourceIP: 80.109.55.137 Received: by mole.fafoe.narf.at (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AAF1C6D47B; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:27:32 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 20:27:32 +0100 From: Stefan Farfeleder To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: svn commit: r257133 - head/sys/dev/iwn Message-ID: <20131028192731.GA1505@mole.fafoe.narf.at> References: <201310251944.r9PJis6q004419@svn.freebsd.org> <20131027101106.GA2843@mole.fafoe.narf.at> <20131028190005.GA1509@mole.fafoe.narf.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" , "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" , "src-committers@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 19:27:41 -0000 On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:07:17PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Yeah: > > Oct 28 19:43:43 mole kernel: iwn5000_tx_done: qid 3 idx 4 retries 7 > nkill 0 rate a902 duration 686 status 83 > > status 0x83 is LONG_LIMIT, which meant it tried to transmit and it > failed to get an ACK each time. > > The rate control says: > > 0x02: the rate in question > bit 8: MCS > bit 11: HT40 > bits 14+15: transmit antennas A+B > > .. and it's an association/management frame, which is odd as they're > not supposed to be sent as 11n HT40 frames like this. > > can you do the same experiment but with the patch reverted? I'd like > to see what the selected rate is. Ok, here's the output with r257155 and r257133 reverted: http://pastebin.com/CJzsTANv Stefan