From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Mar 7 13:59:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [207.154.226.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A3E37B71A; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 13:59:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1098) id C4B5181D19; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 15:58:51 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 15:58:51 -0600 From: Bill Fumerola To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: Doug Rabson , arch@freebsd.org, dawes@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DRI drivers in base system? Message-ID: <20010307155851.E31752@elvis.mu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from des@ofug.org on Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 07:17:23PM +0100 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-FEARSOME-20010209 i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I think src/sys/dev/dri/ is a good place. The code is under a BSD-like > license, so no worries about sys/contrib or anything. sys/contrib's charter isn't "code of which we don't like the license", its for code that isn't native to our tree / is maintained by an external source. There is lots (file, tcpdump, less, etc) of BSD licensed software in src/contrib. DRI seems to be a candidate for sys/contrib. FWIW - I fully support it entering the tree. -- Bill Fumerola - security yahoo / Yahoo! inc. - fumerola@yahoo-inc.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message