From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 28 08:47:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88FD716A40F for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:47:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gamato@users.sf.net) Received: from mail.pipni.cz (mail.pipni.cz [193.86.238.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1DB843C9E for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:47:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gamato@users.sf.net) Received: from mail.pipni.cz ([193.86.238.3]:37460 helo=gamato.org) id 1Goyd6-0003Z7-NA; Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:47:52 +0100 From: "mato" To: Lowell Gilbert Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:47:52 +0100 Message-Id: <20061128084344.M35001@pobox.sk> In-Reply-To: <44slhgs8dd.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <4538D602.3090608@pobox.sk> <44slhgs8dd.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.51 20050627 X-OriginatingIP: 160.218.43.253 (m@gamato.org) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: where to set SSL compile time cipher string ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:47:55 -0000 On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 11:00:46 -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote > martinko writes: > > > I'm not sure I understood this correctly but at > > I've read something > > about cipher list and defaults etc. And I would like to tell my system > > to build SSL with ``high'' encryption cipher suites. Where can I set > > this preference pls ?? I've searched through make.conf and man pages > > but haven't found anything. > > Any particular reason? After all, that won't make your system more secure... well, i guess the reason was basically the same one i have with mozilla/seamonkey -- first thing i do on fresh install is to disable all the weak ciphers (like DES etc). anyway, the question was if and how, not why.. ;-)