From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 20 13:27:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEC61065672 for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:27:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD2288FC1B for ; Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:27:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (ppp118-210-23-247.lns20.adl2.internode.on.net [118.210.23.247]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nAKDRp2P004330 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:57:54 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Marius =?utf-8?q?N=C3=BCnnerich?= Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:57:41 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <200911202302.24794.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4900498.MQGecgO8Cm"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200911202357.48622.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -2.212 () BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: Tom Evans , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Stefan Bethke Subject: Re: whats best pracfive for ZFS on a whole disc these days ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:27:57 -0000 --nextPart4900498.MQGecgO8Cm Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Marius N=FCnnerich wrote: > > Actually that is an interesting point, the swap partitions don't > > have an entry in /dev/gptid, although perhaps that is because > > glabel has grabbed that node. > > If I remember correctly nodes vanish when another name for the same > device is opened. Maybe this happens for the other gpt labels too? Hmm, but I have gptid ones corresponding to my ZFS partitions.. It seems=20 like a bug. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart4900498.MQGecgO8Cm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBLBplU5ZPcIHs/zowRAmHcAJ92/5zwkVgIgzH3cBcPu9Pf1uLeKACeOwGB ZjLJUd3z1VQVpByEriAJbCw= =xCt0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4900498.MQGecgO8Cm--