From owner-freebsd-net Sun Sep 23 10:43:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from prism.flugsvamp.com (cb58709-a.mdsn1.wi.home.com [24.17.241.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295E337B419 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 10:43:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jlemon@localhost) by prism.flugsvamp.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f8NHE5080834; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 12:14:05 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jlemon) Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 12:14:05 -0500 (CDT) From: Jonathan Lemon Message-Id: <200109231714.f8NHE5080834@prism.flugsvamp.com> To: winter@jurai.net, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: review request. X-Newsgroups: local.mail.freebsd-net In-Reply-To: Organization: Cc: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In article you write: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >sys/net/if.c and bpf.c have problems with if_detach() and >bpfdetach() when they are called with a struct ifnet that has not had >if_attach() and bpfattach() called on it. Null pointer reference -> >*boom* etc. I would say that this is to be expected. Why is the system calling the detach functions on a device that isn't attached in the first place? -- Jonathan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message