Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 22:42:04 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Gary Jennejohn <garyj@muc.de> Cc: Christian Haan <chn@intego.de>, freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: i4b and CAPI Message-ID: <11021.967149724@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 24 Aug 2000 22:35:25 %2B0200." <200008242035.WAA31405@peedub.muc.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200008242035.WAA31405@peedub.muc.de>, Gary Jennejohn writes: >Christian Haan writes: >> I would very much like to get a feedback to see how many people are >intereste >> d in a CAPI implementation for *BSD. >> > >A CAPI implementation would be a good thing. It would allow us to >finally support a number of active cards. The question is, how do we >best implement it for FreeBSD ? I personally think that we should >take advantage of the netgraph stuff to wedge a CAPI into place. Netgraph is probably the only way to do it sanely... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?11021.967149724>