From owner-freebsd-ipfw Thu Jun 27 11:47:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from malkav.snowmoon.com (malkav.snowmoon.com [209.23.60.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6C5B37B411 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 11:46:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 7542 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2002 18:46:52 -0000 Received: from localhost.snowmoon.com (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.snowmoon.com with SMTP; 27 Jun 2002 18:46:52 -0000 Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 14:46:52 -0400 (EDT) From: jaime@snowmoon.com To: Luigi Rizzo Cc: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfw fwd and bridging In-Reply-To: <20020627104301.A50086@iguana.icir.org> Message-ID: <20020627144549.X7490-100000@malkav.snowmoon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 01:12:01PM -0400, Jaime wrote: > > any to any 80" to work the way that I expected. The man page seems to > > indicate that fwd and bridge are incompatible. Is this true? > > yes. How about divert and bridge? I saw no mention of bridge in the divert manpage. Will an ipfw divert rule, a natd process, and bridging work together on the same box? Jaime To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message