Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 13:25:06 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu> To: grog@lemis.de Cc: "Mike O'Brien" <obrien@antares.aero.org>, FreeBSD Chat <chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: X-inside memory footprint Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.95.970128132030.8252M-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu> In-Reply-To: <199701271437.PAA11821@freebie.lemis.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 27 Jan 1997 grog@lemis.de wrote: > I've been told on good authority that XAccel has a number of leaks, > but this doesn't fit the pattern. The memory usage goes up gradually > over a period of some time, and Netscrape doesn't seem to accelerate > this behaviour. I fired one up just a while back, and it hasn't > changed the VSZ at all. Ever X server I've used seems to exhibit the gradual growth behavior. X doubt XAccel would be any worse than, say, XFree86 on this front. Every week or two, when the server gets too big for my liking, I re-start it. -john
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.95.970128132030.8252M-100000>