Date: Sun, 2 Feb 1997 10:37:21 +0100 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: durham@w2xo.pgh.pa.us (Jim Durham) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: packet driver Message-ID: <Mutt.19970202103721.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <32F3F5CF.167EB0E7@w2xo.pgh.pa.us>; from Jim Durham on Feb 1, 1997 21:02:55 -0500 References: <Mutt.19970201131432.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> <32F3F5CF.167EB0E7@w2xo.pgh.pa.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Jim Durham wrote: > The "Net" code is actually part of a complete system using "Net" to > handle the radio ports, with a packet BBS and internet/packet-bbs > mail gateway that uses sendmail to do most of the work. There is > also some code to allow interfacing to a web page to view and send > packet radio mail. > > My question is should I just do an "official" port of "Net" for > starters and do the BBS and gateway separately so that those not > wanting those services could just compile "Net"? I'm not sure about this. What do the other ports people think? Also, do you wanna maintain that port yourself, or does somebody else volunteer doing it? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Mutt.19970202103721.j>