Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2017 14:05:06 -0600 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Beeblebrox <zaphod@berentweb.com> Cc: Fernando Herrero =?iso-8859-1?Q?Carr=F3n?= <elferdo@gmail.com>, "freebsd-x11@freebsd.org" <freebsd-x11@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: End of year Xorg status rant Message-ID: <20170101200506.GA6551@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20170101183653.2c85698a@rsbsd.rsb> References: <20161230163653.54909631@rsbsd.rsb> <15952279f17.e0be0d8c34357.732964216134709731@nextbsd.org> <20161231120453.13adf858@thor.walstatt.dynvpn.de> <20161231145143.18e6ac99@rsbsd.rsb> <CAMwkeZz%2BJA2Lzjs9=MYVvYrU61XbLnfdYbwqAwXL3oBPWdw9kQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170101183653.2c85698a@rsbsd.rsb>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 06:36:53PM +0300, Beeblebrox via freebsd-x11 wrote: > If it's because they have integrated Matt's work, why has FreeBSD not > opted to do so? You missed the part about: > Now that the diff with upstream has been reduced from 12,000-15,000+ > lines below 300-400 lines the "activation energy" to update has been > reduced by a factor of 5-10x. This is a recent development (past few weeks IIUC). I don't know of many people who would be willing to tackle a 15kline diff. There are many who could tackle 400 lines. (I guess Macy really _has_ been doing a lot of work ...) mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170101200506.GA6551>