From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 6 23:09:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFABD1065679 for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 23:09:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matheusber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f191.google.com (mail-yw0-f191.google.com [209.85.211.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E89A8FC0A for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 23:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh29 with SMTP id 29so1178885ywh.13 for ; Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:09:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:date:from:to :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4H7OMlZTjeBMjJLXv8VH9cHhjOMJmIbs5tOtaF7d0UQ=; b=Wpa1TRaStlZb0NpGBc4fB7ylIMJbfwrkaBfTbGookPgfLXaa3+DwitKnSRVi7C+Uzw AX/qLHuiknG7O4qonn1vHAR1OXp6+twzDBV5VuAtPlOA9zi1lya9No7a9MM89Uh+H5tj UoOeaGipXEbJLDn1+ZN6zl2biLqHCDglmc2Ww= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QDX9z8884Jh1qcVkAHUuaY231zXCRh0V8XYZYx1AFq5PJXCftXYFoo5hT0r296x09S tybkgrHfgeTHd/27YJHIpfe81kekfLFh9SGSsP7cXejHiUejCvaUQ9XlmJBEYs6DwB7v 29kbFqLJSUZkOh1KGXHN0RHtAt/XLQpNLhbyg= Received: by 10.150.160.18 with SMTP id i18mr6450945ybe.247.1265497786106; Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:09:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from cygnus.homeunix.com ([189.71.106.77]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm916950yxe.3.2010.02.06.15.09.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:09:45 -0800 (PST) Sender: Nenhum_de_Nos Received: from arroway.apartnet (arroway.apartnet [10.1.1.80]) by cygnus.homeunix.com (Postfix) with SMTP id F03D3B8A1D for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 20:09:38 -0300 (BRT) Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 20:11:12 -0300 From: Nenhum_de_Nos To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20100206201112.89fc5fff.matheus@eternamente.info> In-Reply-To: <4B67C963.2080705@entel.upc.edu> References: <18D68DBE18AC435984C5F66597A869D3@artemis> <201001280000.16773.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <201001290913.36223.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <27396532.post@talk.nabble.com> <4B66CF4E.1000709@entel.upc.edu> <27411112.post@talk.nabble.com> <4B67C963.2080705@entel.upc.edu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.9; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PATCH] VirtualBox headless VNC support by LibVNCServer X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 23:09:47 -0000 On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 07:42:43 +0100 Gustau P=E9rez wrote: >=20 > > Daisuke's patch only applies to VBoxHeadless. There are no modification= s in > > VBoxManage (shouldn't be very complicated to put the VNC options there = too, > > though). > > > > You can launch several VM with embedded VNC servers provided that you u= se > > different binding IP addresses or ports. You'll want to use the "-p, > > -vncport, --vncport " option to do that. The default port is 5900= , but > > you can use the following ones (supposedly up to 5906) or any port you = want. > > With the VNC client I mentioned, you can use a syntax like IP:port to > > specify a non standard port. > > > > =20 >=20 > You are right, it was my mistake not to check VBoxHeadless. Then I did > check it and it works > flawlessly ! >=20 > Best regards, >=20 > Gustau > > Best regards, > > > > Hubert as there is success in testing, is this committed to the ports or will be i= n not so much time ? my vbox is bringing down my pc when running Folding at Home in debian amd64= vm. so I'll rebuild it and would like to give this a try :) thanks, matheus --=20 We will call you Cygnus, The God of balance you shall be A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style