From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 05:33:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66AC37B401 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 05:33:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.dada.it (mail3.dada.it [195.110.100.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5199143F3F for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 05:33:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from riccardo@torrini.org) Received: (qmail 1785 invoked from network); 9 Apr 2003 12:32:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO torrini.org) (195.110.114.101) by mail.dada.it with SMTP; 9 Apr 2003 12:32:57 -0000 Received: from trudy.torrini.home (localhost.torrini.home [127.0.0.1]) by torrini.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h39CWwY9003606; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 14:32:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from riccardo@trudy.torrini.home) Received: (from riccardo@localhost) by trudy.torrini.home (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h39CWvu7003605; Wed, 9 Apr 2003 14:32:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2003 14:32:57 +0200 From: Riccardo Torrini To: Richard Tobin Message-ID: <20030409123257.GA3598@trudy.torrini.home> References: <200304091025.LAA13913@sorley.cogsci.ed.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200304091025.LAA13913@sorley.cogsci.ed.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Unix epoch changed? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2003 12:33:06 -0000 On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 11:25:00AM +0100, Richard Tobin wrote: >> I'm trying to figure how a file can have a date _before_ unix epoch. > It's a signed value. > It runs from -2^31 (13 Dec 1901) to 2^31-1 (19 Jan 2038) with 0 > (1 Jan 1970) in the middle. Ok, I remember wrong. But the question remain: why find -mtime -2 show a file from 1906 (near 100 year ago) instead of 2 days old? -- Riccardo.