From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 28 19:00:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1610616A4DA for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5C713C474 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:00:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0SJ04K3057821 for ; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:00:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m0SJ04rk057820; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:00:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:00:04 GMT Message-Id: <200801281900.m0SJ04rk057820@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org From: Max Laier Cc: Subject: Re: kern/120057: [patch] Allow proper settings of ALTQ_HFSC. The check i wrong since even with the values forbidden from this check you get a concave curve. X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Max Laier List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:00:05 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/120057; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Max Laier To: bug-followup@freebsd.org, eri@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/120057: [patch] Allow proper settings of ALTQ_HFSC. The check i wrong since even with the values forbidden from this check you get a concave curve. Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:45:01 +0100 http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~hzhang/HFSC/main.html agrees with the pfctl restrictions. Can you give an example that is restricted by this check and shouldn't be? - Max