From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 30 06:37:51 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1895A37B401
	for <threads@freebsd.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 06:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7791B43FBF
	for <threads@freebsd.org>; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 06:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.8/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h5UDbnAI025243;
	Mon, 30 Jun 2003 09:37:49 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 09:37:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com
To: xiong jinshan <xiongjinshan@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030630080920.82179.qmail@web80504.mail.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10306300936460.22873-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: threads@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: About the kse signal process
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: deischen@freebsd.org
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 13:37:51 -0000

On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, xiong jinshan wrote:

> Hi,
>   I am wondering that the following piece of code
> can't work with the unix semantics. I tested it with
> 5.1 release and i386 arch. By unix sementics, if I
> send the SIGALRM to this running programme, it should
> be received by the thr_func() only, and print a prompt
> msg on the console.

Yes, only thr_func() should receive the alarm.

> 
> Reguards,
> JinShan
> 
> Ps: c code:
> 
> /* vi: set ts=4 sw=4 expandtab: */
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <signal.h>
> #include <pthread.h>
> 
> void sigalrm_handler(int signo)
> {
>     if(signo != SIGALRM)
>         abort();
> 
>     printf("Received sig alarm!\n");
>     return;
> }
> 
> void thr_func(void)
> {
>     sigset_t mask;
>     struct sigaction sa;
> 
>     sigemptyset(&mask);
>     sigaddset(&mask, SIGALRM);
>     pthread_sigmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, &mask, NULL);
> 
>     memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(struct sigaction));
>     sa.sa_handler = sigalrm_handler;
>     sigaction(SIGALRM, &sa, NULL);
> 
>     while(1);
> }
> 
> main()
> {
>     int err;
>     pthread_t pth;
>     sigset_t mask;
> 
>     sigfillset(&mask);
>     sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, &mask, NULL);
> 
>     err = pthread_create(&pth, NULL, thr_func, NULL);
>     if(err < 0) {
>         perror("pthread_create!\n");
>         return -1;
>     }
> 
>     while(1);

-- 
Dan Eischen