From owner-freebsd-chat  Wed Mar 13 14:04:53 1996
Return-Path: owner-chat
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA29298
          for chat-outgoing; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 14:04:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cabal.io.org (cabal.io.org [198.133.36.103])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA29282
          for <chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 14:04:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from taob@localhost) by cabal.io.org (8.7.4/8.7.4) id RAA02444; Wed, 13 Mar 1996 17:03:05 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 17:03:05 -0500 (EST)
From: Brian Tao <taob@io.org>
To: Peter Wemm <peter@jhome.DIALix.COM>
cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Build numbers! :-) 
In-Reply-To: <199603131938.DAA02443@jhome.DIALix.COM>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960313170143.2002M-100000@cabal.io.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 14 Mar 1996, Peter Wemm wrote:
> 
> Basically, I use use config -n on the very rare occasion that I actually run
> config.  Most of the time it's building a new test kernel, which I do
> anaverage of about two a day.  I *always* use 'make depend'.

    Really?  All you need is a "make depend && make" when you have new
kernel source?  I figured it would be safer to always do a "config
BLAH" to remove traces of old files.
--
Brian Tao (BT300, taob@io.org)
Systems Administrator, Internex Online Inc.
"Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"