From owner-freebsd-alpha Fri Sep 28 9:10:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mta05.mail.mel.aone.net.au (mta05.mail.au.uu.net [203.2.192.85]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3932C37B410 for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2001 09:10:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ausyddtp0050.ozemail.com.au ([203.166.66.104]) by mta05.mail.mel.aone.net.au with ESMTP id <20010928161029.MPKP2135.mta05.mail.mel.aone.net.au@ausyddtp0050.ozemail.com.au> for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2001 02:10:29 +1000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010929020856.01e54ec0@pop.ozemail.com.au> X-Sender: rbyrnes@pop.ozemail.com.au X-Mailer: I wish it was Linux Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 02:10:22 +1000 To: alpha@freebsd.org From: Rob B Subject: Re: gcc error compiling KDE2 In-Reply-To: <15284.37752.487882.384160@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> References: <200109281505.LAA13207@duke.cs.duke.edu> <15284.29589.489153.736235@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <200109281505.LAA13207@duke.cs.duke.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 01:12 29/09/2001, Andrew Gallatin wrote: >Matthew Rezny writes: > > Thanks for the info. I have a 21164PC so its EV56 architecture and > > extentension instructions present are BWX and MVI. Does using -mev56 > > rather than -mev4 provide a performance increase or does it just help > > out the problem? > >Using bwx should also provide a performance increase. Does bwx get enabled by using -mev56 or should it be explicitly set, and if so, how? Any other compiler flag tips? Rob -- The future ain't what it used to be. This is random quote 920 of a collection of 1161 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message