From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 16:59:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5A616A4B3; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:59:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 067ED43FFB; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:59:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from parv_fm@mailsent.net) Received: from moo.holy.cow ([68.67.226.33]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.32 201-253-122-126-132-20030307) with ESMTP id <20030930235928.YRBV10023.mta11.adelphia.net@moo.holy.cow>; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 19:59:28 -0400 Received: by moo.holy.cow (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 83CF5AC71; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:02:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:02:45 -0400 From: parv To: Franz Klammer Message-ID: <20031001000245.GA360@moo.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Franz Klammer , Joe Marcus Clarke , Michael Collette , FreeBSD Mailing Lists References: <200309300115.05714.metrol@metrol.net> <1064910135.48606.6.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <1064934538.46705.13.camel@sisko.webonaut.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1064934538.46705.13.camel@sisko.webonaut.com> cc: Michael Collette cc: Joe Marcus Clarke cc: FreeBSD Mailing Lists Subject: Re: About that Freetype2 update X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 23:59:28 -0000 in message <1064934538.46705.13.camel@sisko.webonaut.com>, wrote Franz Klammer thusly... > > i had the a problem with blur font display after upgrading to the > latest version. adding back bytecode solves it. > > here some screenshots with and without bytcode enabled: > > http://webonaut.com/temp/bytecode/ Interesting! I had only seen[0] the fuzzier version of an anti-aliased font (as seen in "*without_bytecode*" images), believing it to be the "feature" of anti aliasing. That, the fuzziness, was highly distracting, so i have been using plain olde UN-anti-aliased(?) fonts. Now i know better. Thanks everybody. [0] I saw fuzziness in fvwm 2.5.x, xterm, and Mozilla, all running w/ help of XFree86 4.2.0. I did not note the whether the version of freetype. - Parv --