From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sun May 26 15:26:39 1996
Return-Path: owner-bugs
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA27119
          for bugs-outgoing; Sun, 26 May 1996 15:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ki.net (root@ki.net [205.150.102.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA27090;
          Sun, 26 May 1996 15:26:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by ki.net (8.7.5/8.7.5) with SMTP id SAA03319; Sun, 26 May 1996 18:25:51 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 26 May 1996 18:25:50 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net>
To: Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>
cc: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@freefall.freebsd.org>,
        freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org, asami@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/198
In-Reply-To: <199605262206.AAA03733@uriah.heep.sax.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.93.960526182451.2226F-100000@ki.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 27 May 1996, J Wunsch wrote:

> As Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > Synopsis: 1.1.5.1 pine binary loops; top shows fancy values
> 
> > asami is in charge of ports...?
> 
> Hmm.  I think 1.1.5.1 binaries are history now.
>
	Yes, but I seem to recall that bug might still exist in
2.x...or at least did until recently.  I *thought* it was a bug
in pine itself...

Marc G. Fournier                                  scrappy@ki.net
Systems Administrator @ ki.net               scrappy@freebsd.org