From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 25 19:38:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F59716A4DD for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:38:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from a50.ironport.com (a50.ironport.com [63.251.108.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93FB43D4C for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:38:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from unknown (HELO [10.251.18.229]) ([10.251.18.229]) by a50.ironport.com with ESMTP; 25 Jul 2006 12:38:13 -0700 Message-ID: <44C67325.8040504@elischer.org> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 12:38:13 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060414 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Candler References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060721105813.0971ae90@lariat.net> <20060724090909.GB3412@uk.tiscali.com> <200607241609.30783.zec@icir.org> <20060724192419.GA5474@uk.tiscali.com> <44C5302D.1020807@elischer.org> <20060725073436.GA7477@uk.tiscali.com> In-Reply-To: <20060725073436.GA7477@uk.tiscali.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Marko Zec , Brett Glass Subject: Re: Multiple NAT router X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 19:38:14 -0000 Brian Candler wrote: >On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 01:40:13PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > >>an ng_ip node :-) >>I've considerred it. >> >> > >Then all the tools like 'netstat' and 'route' need modifying to talk to a >netgraph socket, but in principle I don't see why it couldn't be done. > >ISTM there are a zillion userland-to-kernel and kernel-to-kernel >communication interfaces: >- ioctl >- geom >- cam >- netgraph >- vfs >- sysctl >- kmem >- procfs >- ... > >Perhaps they could all be replaced by netgraph?? > > no, netgraph's interface is very specialised in its characteristics. though you could replace tun, tap and gif very easily. >Regards, > >Brian. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >