From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon May 15 22: 4:17 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from vicosa.dpi.ufv.br (vicosa.dpi.ufv.br [200.17.74.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF7337B609
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 15 May 2000 22:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kernel@tdnet.com.br)
Received: from tdnet.com.br (port12.tdnet.com.br [200.236.148.112]) by vicosa.dpi.ufv.br (AIX4.2/UCB 8.7/8.7) with ESMTP id CAA13776 for <questions@freebsd.org>; Tue, 16 May 2000 02:03:54 -0200 (GRNLNDDT)
Message-ID: <3920AB51.22F54FCA@tdnet.com.br>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 01:58:41 +0000
From: Gustavo Vieira Goncalves Coelho Rios <kernel@tdnet.com.br>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: what's the advantage...
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I got surprised when i compiled two versions of the same program, and
the one statically (-static flag) linked use less memory than that
dynamically linked.

How can one program that were static linked uses less memory that the
same one done using the default linking?

PS: I used ps -aux to see how much memory they did used.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message