From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Jan 17 12:59:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCD314FBF for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:59:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from workhorse (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by lariat.lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA27879; Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:57:49 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000117134916.019f97a0@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:49:54 -0700 To: Jonathon McKitrick From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Microsoft go it right ;-) Cc: "van Rooij, Guido" , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: <4.2.2.20000117131053.019b3d30@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 01:37 PM 1/17/2000 , Jonathon McKitrick wrote: >Could this simply be attributed to the explorer code being more tightly >linked to the OS? And M$ knowing all the back doors to squeeze >performance out of their own OS system calls? No; it's the SERVER that responds more slowly. I've watched on a network monitor. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message