From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Jul 9 13:30:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from turtle.looksharp.net (cc360882-a.strhg1.mi.home.com [24.2.221.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2AC337BE3D; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 13:30:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsdx@looksharp.net) Received: from localhost (bsdx@localhost) by turtle.looksharp.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA30544; Sun, 9 Jul 2000 16:30:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bsdx@looksharp.net) Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2000 16:30:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Adam To: John Baldwin Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: making the snoop device loadable. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>> Ok, I give in to the argument. I would just like to make a wish. On Jan >>> 24 1999 peter took the NO_LKM option out of LINT. I assume the support >>> for it in other files was removed around that time also. Could someone >>> implement a NO_KLD option so you dont need to use securelevel > 0 so >>> people have an obvious option and dont have to know the kernel well enough >>> to hack syscalls.master? >> >>Patches accepted. :) Seriously, if you come up with a patchset >>I'll look at it and see about getting it in the tree. >> >>John Baldwin -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ > >Thanks for the offer, but I've already mentioned in an earlier email I >couldnt code hello world without documentation if my life depended on >it. If it helps, I think you can use X in netbsd in higher securelevels. Oops, duh, replied to the wrong subject. I'll try to find the commits removing NO_LKM support and see what I can do, it might be similar. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message