From owner-freebsd-database@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 4 20:53:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-database@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0492716A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 20:53:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9549F43D2D for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 20:53:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linicks@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 40so331298rnz for ; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:53:29 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=auRIhH8+BVb0aYP1UUtuiOS17BON+8gjPDyYWrT6UP1R3mfAjnpF6VkFUkrEzWkp90O1oOBjm1mfYrUO/xIxUX5b2coJdjBApkhSPg1grXNl9cFjPbj2A2Y/38yKC5Smb8KDI+vQy2VWECv1yw8ksutmbTeYbCUchCpebVX6Jvw= Received: by 10.38.8.57 with SMTP id 57mr165278rnh; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 12:53:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.8.20 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:53:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:53:28 -0700 From: Nick Pavlica To: freebsd-database@freebsd.org, Nick Pavlica In-Reply-To: <200502041204.j14C4vCe083455@lurza.secnetix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <200502041204.j14C4vCe083455@lurza.secnetix.de> Subject: Re: MySql Load balancing Solutions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-database@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nick Pavlica List-Id: Database use and development under FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 20:53:34 -0000 Oliver, Please contact MySql for verification/clarification like I did. The MySql Rep. explained to me that by installing the database on more that one computer, even if it is for you own use, it is considered a distributed piece of software and should be licenced. Obviously if you are replicating or clustering you are going to have more than one server running the database and should licence the software. If this truly isn't the case, I would like to have it cleared up with MySql.=20 The reps info is as follows: Rena Dosono Inside Sales Executive MySQL, Inc. www.mysql.com Tel: 206-824-4356 Email: rena@mysql.com You may want to talk to another Rep to get an additional take. --Nick On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:04:57 +0100 (CET), Oliver Fromme wrote: > Nick Pavlica wrote: > > [...] > > > Uh --- MySQL Cluster is a standard part of 4.1.9. You just have to > > > install the mysql41-server port WITH_NDB=3Dyes, which gets you a bun= ch > > > of extra executables, mostly in /usr/local/libexec, including ndb_mg= md > > > and ndbd. See: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/ndbcluster.html > > > > Yes it's part of 4.19, but if your software is not licenced under the > > GPL you must buy a licence for the MySql servers ($595/server), and > > another licence for MySql Cluster($5,000/CPU). >=20 > That only applies if you are redistributing mysql. If > you are only _using_ it, then it doesn't matter at all, > and your other software doesn't have to be GPL. >=20 > Specifically, www.mysql.com says [1]: >=20 > "Free use for those who never copy, modify or distribute. > As long as you never distribute the MySQL Software in any > way, you are free to use it for powering your application, > irrespective of whether your application is under GPL > license or not." >=20 > That's as clear as it can get. :-) >=20 > Best regards > Oliver >=20 > [1]: > http://www.mysql.com/company/legal/licensing/opensource-license.html >=20 > -- > Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 M=FCnchen > Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author > and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. >=20 > "It combines all the worst aspects of C and Lisp: a billion different > sublanguages in one monolithic executable. It combines the power of C > with the readability of PostScript." > -- Jamie Zawinski, when asked: "What's wrong with perl?" >