From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Mar 30 15:16:27 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA19812
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 30 Mar 1997 15:16:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA19802
          for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 30 Mar 1997 15:16:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id PAA23903; Sun, 30 Mar 1997 15:16:19 -0800 (PST)
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: make -j3 on make world? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 30 Mar 1997 17:10:15 -0400."
             <Pine.NEB.3.96.970330170741.199A-100000@thelab.hub.org> 
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 1997 15:16:15 -0800
Message-ID: <23854.859763775@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 	The only change is adding ${MAKEFLAGS} to the ${MAKE} line so
> that the -j3 flag carried down into the subdir's, so that make world
> works with parellel make...

That seems an entirely reasonable change - I can't see any reason
why you *wouldn't* want MAKEFLAGS passed.  Of course, this is also
not the only place where ${MAKE} is used without makeflags (heh,
and I always thought make passed MAKEFLAGS down *implicitly* to
submakes as a special case).

					Jordan