From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Oct 17 10:30: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7646637B4E5 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 10:30:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id KAA85226; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 10:30:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 10:30:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200010171730.KAA85226@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Sean Kelly Subject: Re: ports/20665: [PATCH] Update PORTVERSION for JadeTeX port Reply-To: Sean Kelly Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/20665; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sean Kelly To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/20665: [PATCH] Update PORTVERSION for JadeTeX port Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 12:14:51 -0700 OK, I guess I should be glad there are anal retentive people working for the good of FreeBSD. :-) In the audit-trail, ade wrote: > This patch is incomplete. You've bumped the port version number > in the makefile, but have not provided an updated files/md5, D'oh! The diff for files/md5 is below. Thanks for noticing this. --- jadetex.old/files/md5 Sun Oct 8 16:31:03 2000 +++ jadetex/files/md5 Sun Oct 8 16:32:10 2000 @@ -1 +1 @@ -MD5 (jadetex-2.18.zip) = 278f96db5d43b80a8a46750580bf25f2 +MD5 (jadetex-2.20.zip) = 796a5e229a8e19810ff8924b00783431 > nor checked to see if there are PLIST (or other) changes that need > to be made. And you drive a pickle wagon. Of course, I have no proof of this, just as you don't that I didn't check for PLIST or other changes that need to be made. And no, the PLIST doesn't need updating. --k To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message