From owner-freebsd-current Sat Feb 27 22:15:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8827614E69 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 1999 22:15:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.6.6) with ESMTP id GAA22496; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 06:14:48 GMT Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id XAA54962; Sat, 27 Feb 1999 23:15:19 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199902280615.XAA54962@harmony.village.org> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Subject: Re: gcc Cc: Chuck Robey , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 27 Feb 1999 17:25:28 PST." <19877.920165128@zippy.cdrom.com> References: <19877.920165128@zippy.cdrom.com> Date: Sat, 27 Feb 1999 23:15:19 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <19877.920165128@zippy.cdrom.com> "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: : I'm not sure I'd call it a "decision", but there are strong leanings : towards egcs. It simply seems to be moving more aggressively (and : more well-fundedly) in the right directions whereas gcc 2.8.1 has been : very slow to update. I for one would love to see 2.8.1 or newer in the tree for my own, selfish reasons. Many ports (new architectures) would benefit from this. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message