From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Mar 13 13:56:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from gvr.gvr.org (gvr.gvr.org [212.61.40.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21E537B718 for ; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 13:56:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from guido@gvr.org) Received: by gvr.gvr.org (Postfix, from userid 657) id 570EA5808; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 22:56:12 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 22:56:12 +0100 From: Guido van Rooij To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Cc: Peter Pentchev Subject: Re: [PATCH] add a SITE MD5 command to ftpd Message-ID: <20010313225612.A37102@gvr.gvr.org> References: <20010313211544.B17733@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <20010313133909.A83966@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010313133909.A83966@dragon.nuxi.com>; from TrimYourCc@NUXI.com on Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 01:39:09PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 01:39:09PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 09:15:44PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > I know that adding a ``SITE MD5 filename'' command to our ftpd > > is a *very* little step in a possibly wrong direction (this will > > I am very against adding Yet One More inconsistency (read local hack) > that takes our ftpd farther from the other BSD's. Some of us have hopes > of using the LukeM/NetBSD ftpd in FreeBSD. This hack will be more more > thing that the nay sayers use to prevent this from happening. So? If Peter is willing to port his code over? Since this is a plain addition, that should be fairly trivial. I think it is not a bad idea and if he is willing to implement it, let him. Your line of thinking is IMHO a block of progress. -Guido To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message