From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 21 14:59:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488AC16A420; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:59:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (vaak.stack.nl [131.155.140.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F8143D5C; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:59:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from hammer.stack.nl (hammer.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::153]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1809BA2FCA; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:59:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hammer.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333) id EB5BB66D0; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:59:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:59:30 +0200 From: Marc Olzheim To: Andrey Chernov , Marc Olzheim , current@FreeBSD.ORG, wpaul@ctr.columbia.edu Message-ID: <20050721145930.GC77847@stack.nl> References: <20050721134816.GA8550@nagual.pp.ru> <20050721142445.GA77847@stack.nl> <20050721143443.GB10010@nagual.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050721143443.GB10010@nagual.pp.ru> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD hammer.stack.nl 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: Subject: Re: rl(4) is not ready for mpsafenet net enough? (silent reboots) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:59:37 -0000 --IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 06:34:43PM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote: > > I thought rl cards were inherently MP unsafe because of design > > flaws. Does anyone know it they can be used safely nowadays anyway ? >=20 > This is not something about MP exactly, but about internal logic flaws. A= s=20 > I wrote, I have _UP_ machine. That doesn't seem to matter. :-/ Could you hook up a comconsole ? I wonder whether you see the "Consider adding 'options NET_WITH_GIANT' or setting debug.mpsafenet=3D0" message before the crash. I assume you have DDB the kernel ? Marc --IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC37hSezjnobFOgrERAq6LAJ0TShMfilWv3H/jFPJoyEhbNwnK6wCfQq7c lBjz3mMzk/QfzxcSw7rAWYo= =7xRn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IrhDeMKUP4DT/M7F--