Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:49:40 +0400
From:      Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@cell.sick.ru>
To:        Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [HEADS-UP] mbuma is in the tree
Message-ID:  <20040602094940.GA80394@cell.sick.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20040531215101.GA60299@freefall.freebsd.org>
References:  <20040531215101.GA60299@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
  Bosko,

On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 02:51:01PM -0700, Bosko Milekic wrote:
B> mbuma is an Mbuf & Cluster allocator built on top of a number of
B> extensions to the UMA framework, all included herein.

  are you going to convert mbuf tag allocator to UMA? Now
tags are allocated with malloc(). AFAIK, tags are used heavily in pf,
and forthcoming ALTQ. Moving to UMA should affect their performance
positively.

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.
GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040602094940.GA80394>