From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 20:18:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BC41065674 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 20:18:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin.barnabas@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B5F68FC08 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 20:18:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so8435850pbb.13 for ; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 13:18:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=m6y+Zl5OpdvqeqBjnPOfNSodJ1QVmnTEZvbztn6V/AU=; b=qWrF2CXXS43aypR2u8XL7DWCVzKOPObp56UuGkKUAGMf4zOXK4b7d6CWE8j4DGhgQn CWg7r2luYvGPLKyW6Z+uQwpcakQ7O4ZEhin2uHDedGAVNf/IXYFocP+SGOCDEf+tuCDR cgL+7UP102Q2RIOsPujZRGXjZPwzyLlmRlGDKE5zxbOzAuodnrHXrVKXFILBVr7wOvY4 Fozc4RP9ZiOtaIZbT3D4Z6bXjJpVphl8XpivnLGm3djYNm5J5YmnEo8+qugKw8ty2f/y wB2EV7xxEtIxTgIyP98txOrCI6kCTQB/TLeWWTiex7Mq44HnrP9ShxqfdguI3bCzMWcM N34g== Received: by 10.68.138.161 with SMTP id qr1mr13395475pbb.37.1338927517155; Tue, 05 Jun 2012 13:18:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ip68-98-76-182.ph.ph.cox.net. [68.98.76.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ph1sm3444169pbb.45.2012.06.05.13.18.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 05 Jun 2012 13:18:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 13:19:00 -0700 From: Colin Barnabas To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20120605201900.GB60388@hs1.VERBENA> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: Is this something we (as consumers of FreeBSD) need to be aware of?] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 20:18:37 -0000 On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:19:26AM -0700, Kurt Buff wrote: > UEFI considerations drive Fedora to pay MSFT to sign their kernel binaries > http://cwonline.computerworld.com/t/8035515/1292406/565573/0/ > > This would seem to make compiling from source difficult. > > Kurt > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" History show us that _everything_ will eventually run *nix. Take a look at the Sony PS3 debacle. After Sony yanked support for installing other OS's, the community ripped apart their hypervisor in a matter of months. If these boot keys do gain any momentum, sooner than later the community with poke holes in the system. -- Colin Barnabas ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Colin Barnabas