Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 13:48:52 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD-PORTS <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: New Port Options Message-ID: <506FFE84.1030202@passap.ru> In-Reply-To: <20121006093933.GB71753@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <6B7F31C1-0A5C-4B65-AC5B-BCCE21817692@lafn.org> <20121006081341.GC30675@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <506FF7C9.4020807@passap.ru> <20121006093933.GB71753@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
06.10.2012 13:39, Baptiste Daroussin пишет: > On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 01:20:09PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: >> 06.10.2012 12:13, Baptiste Daroussin пишет: >> >>> My first proposition for syntax was: >>> .if !empty(PORT_OPTIONS:MFOO) >>> .endif >>> >>> and >>> .if empty(PORT_OPTIONS:MFOO) >>> .endif >> >> I'd prefer this one... >> >>> Lots of people stated they prefered the concise version: >>> .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MFOO} >>> .endif >>> >>> the reverse of this one can be: >>> >>> .if !${PORT_OPTIONS:MFOO} >>> .endif >>> >>> instead of empty() if you prefer some maintainers uses it. >> >> ...since this one does not work with predefined options (DOCS, >> NLS, EXAMPLES) which are set by default but a user needs to >> unset them. > > Yes it does, or maybe I don't understand correctly what you are expecting :) Hm, I stand corrected. Should have made a syntax error while experimenting. Thanks! ;-) -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?506FFE84.1030202>