Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 06 Oct 2012 13:48:52 +0400
From:      Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru>
To:        Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD-PORTS <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: New Port Options
Message-ID:  <506FFE84.1030202@passap.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20121006093933.GB71753@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
References:  <6B7F31C1-0A5C-4B65-AC5B-BCCE21817692@lafn.org> <20121006081341.GC30675@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <506FF7C9.4020807@passap.ru> <20121006093933.GB71753@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
06.10.2012 13:39, Baptiste Daroussin пишет:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 01:20:09PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
>> 06.10.2012 12:13, Baptiste Daroussin пишет:
>>
>>> My first proposition for syntax was:
>>> .if !empty(PORT_OPTIONS:MFOO)
>>> .endif
>>>
>>> and
>>> .if empty(PORT_OPTIONS:MFOO)
>>> .endif
>>
>> I'd prefer this one...
>>
>>> Lots of people stated they prefered the concise version:
>>> .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MFOO}
>>> .endif
>>>
>>> the reverse of this one can be:
>>>
>>> .if !${PORT_OPTIONS:MFOO}
>>> .endif
>>>
>>> instead of empty() if you prefer some maintainers uses it.
>>
>> ...since this one does not work with predefined options (DOCS,
>> NLS, EXAMPLES) which are set by default but a user needs to
>> unset them.
> 
> Yes it does, or maybe I don't understand correctly what you are expecting :)

Hm, I stand corrected. Should have made a syntax error while
experimenting.

Thanks! ;-)

-- 
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?506FFE84.1030202>