From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 15 10:10:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C316106568D for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:10:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756418FC0C for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:10:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8FAA5eC096875 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:10:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8FAA5iS096874; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:10:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:10:05 GMT Message-Id: <200909151010.n8FAA5iS096874@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: David Southwell Cc: Subject: Re: ports/138835: Python compile failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: David Southwell List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:10:05 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/138835; it has been noted by GNATS. From: David Southwell To: bug-followup@freebsd.org, david@vizion2000.net Cc: miwi@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/138835: Python compile failure Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:05:27 +0100 As reported by Ralph Kenyon >On 2009-09-15T10:08:52+0100, David Southwell wrote: > > I want to understand why bug reports get closed prematurely and without any > > discussion with the original person submitting the report. ... > > Yrs frustrated > > David Southwell > >ps the PR link is: >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=138835 > >(ports/138835: Python compile failure) >I am wondering the same thing. extra-patch-setup.py is wrong. miwi's >"can't confirm" post in ports/138835 doesn't even show the patch being >applied. >Here is the rejects file: >*************** >*** 1273,1279 **** ) libraries = [] - elif platform in ('freebsd4', 'freebsd5', 'freebsd6', 'freebsd7', 'freebsd8'): # FreeBSD's P1003.1b semaphore support is very experimental # and has many known problems. (as of June 2008) macros = dict( # FreeBSD --- 1277,1283 ---- ) libraries = [] + elif platform in ('freebsd4', 'freebsd5', 'freebsd6', 'freebsd7', 'freebsd8', 'freebsd9'): # FreeBSD's P1003.1b semaphore support is very experimental # and has many known problems. (as of June 2008) macros = dict( # FreeBSD >Kenyon Ralph >End of signed message This bug now has a new PR Link is: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=138837