From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 13 19:39:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E2116A49E for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:39:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fquest@ccstores.com) Received: from mail.qcislands.net (mail.qcislands.net [209.53.238.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B5F143D90 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:39:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fquest@ccstores.com) Received: from [209.53.237.85] (helo=[192.168.1.4]) by mail.qcislands.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GjheC-000Opr-Lc; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:39:12 -0800 Message-ID: <4558C9E4.6050008@ccstores.com> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:39:16 -0800 From: Jim Pazarena Organization: City Centre Stores Ltd User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-local_scan: locally submitted (85) Subject: v6 speed compared to previous versions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:39:39 -0000 When I switched to 6.0, then 6.1, it was noticed by most of my clients that my php/mysql/apache system slowed down a fair bit compared to previous version (5.XX). I always like to be on the bleeding edge of FreeBSD, but the performance hit is being commented about by my (few) mysql/php clients. I've seen the "trolls" of past about speed and previous versions, and I would really be interested to hear the actual truth about 6.XX speed. It is my understanding that 6.XX is more optimized for multi-processors, and that for a single processor, 5.XX (or even 4.XX) outperforms 6.XX. Would someone please outline the choices/drawbacks/concerns of even considering going back a series? Thanks, Jim