From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul  1 13:58:07 2009
Return-Path: <owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B1B106566C;
	Wed,  1 Jul 2009 13:58:07 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from brde@optusnet.com.au)
Received: from mail07.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail07.syd.optusnet.com.au
	[211.29.132.188])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 746BB8FC1A;
	Wed,  1 Jul 2009 13:58:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from brde@optusnet.com.au)
Received: from besplex.bde.org (c122-106-161-96.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au
	[122.106.161.96])
	by mail07.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id
	n61DvY9g025213
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Wed, 1 Jul 2009 23:57:35 +1000
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 23:57:34 +1000 (EST)
From: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au>
X-X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org
To: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20090701152300.N96900@mp2.macomnet.net>
Message-ID: <20090701234518.E2035@besplex.bde.org>
References: <200906230555.n5N5tubJ065618@svn.freebsd.org>
	<20090623080015.GK48776@hoeg.nl>
	<20090623125125.F1156@mp2.macomnet.net> <86ljn923dw.fsf@ds4.des.no>
	<20090701152300.N96900@mp2.macomnet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>,
	svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r194681 - head/usr.sbin/wpa/ndis_events
X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current
	<svn-src-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head>,
	<mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-src-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head>,
	<mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:58:07 -0000

On Wed, 1 Jul 2009, Maxim Konovalov wrote:

> On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, 16:38+0200, Dag-Erling Smrgrav wrote:
>
>> Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> writes:
>>> fixed, thanks.
>>
>> It still says
>>
>> static void
>> usage()
>>
>> I know this is allowed by C99, but it's not allowed by style(9).
>>
> From style(9):
>
> static void
> usage()
> {
> 	/* Insert an empty line if the function has no local variables. */
> ...
>
> Apart from the empty line, what's wrong?

style(9) hasn't been converted to its own religion yet :-).  This isn't
exactly a bug, since an old-style Standard C function definition is
still Normal for usage().  Normal file order is a prototype for usage(),
then main() calling usage(), then usage(), so a separate prototype for
usage() is Normal.  Then usage an old-style definition for usage() breaks
K&R support without affecting Standard C support.

Bruce