Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 16:37:26 -0700 From: Matthew Hunt <mph@astro.caltech.edu> To: Andrew Thomson <ajthomson@optushome.com.au> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: spamassassin slow to process messages Message-ID: <20030707233726.GA74181@wopr.caltech.edu> In-Reply-To: <1057619317.52026.28.camel@athomson.prv.au.itouchnet.net> References: <1057619317.52026.28.camel@athomson.prv.au.itouchnet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 09:08:37AM +1000, Andrew Thomson wrote: > I've got a CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (930.32-MHz > 686-class CPU) and I'm seeing performance like, > > Jul 8 08:25:11 athomson spamd[52016]: clean message (0.4/5.0) for > ajt:1001 in 10.2 seconds, 2132 bytes. Well, that's pretty bad. I see: Jul 7 04:05:49 wopr spamd[66708]: identified spam (8.4/5.0) for mph:501 in 4.0 seconds, 1206 bytes. Jul 7 04:08:18 wopr spamd[66726]: clean message (-5.3/5.0) for mph:501 in 7.1 seconds, 2553 bytes. This is on a Cyrix 6x86 (166 MHz 486-class CPU) with no L2 cache. :-) Is the machine heavily loaded with other work? Assuming that there are no messages between the ones you posted, it doesn't look like the machine is overburdened by mail alone. -- Matthew Hunt <mph@astro.caltech.edu> * Science rules. http://www.pobox.com/~mph/ *
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030707233726.GA74181>