From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Oct 31 03:41:39 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 308AC106566B
	for <emulation@freebsd.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 03:41:39 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from vk7rb@internode.on.net)
Received: from mail.internode.on.net (bld-mail17.adl2.internode.on.net
	[150.101.137.102])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753208FC17
	for <emulation@freebsd.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 03:41:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.42] (unverified [59.167.74.65]) 
	by mail.internode.on.net (SurgeMail 3.8f2) with ESMTP id
	7510066-1927428 
	for <emulation@freebsd.org>; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:56:17 +1030 (CDT)
Message-ID: <4AEBAE54.3060300@internode.on.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:26:12 +1100
From: Robert McKenzie <vk7rb@internode.on.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090826)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: emulation@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 
Subject: linux-f10-libidn
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 03:41:39 -0000

Sir,

I am just in the process of updating my system and have noted after 
having done a cvsup using server 18 that my dns ports directory although 
it has an f8 version, does not have an f10 version although the Makefile 
shows a conflict with f10.

You comments would be most appreciated.

Regards,
Robert McKenzie.