From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jan 17 17:31:03 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id RAA25005
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 17:31:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [192.216.222.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id RAA24999
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 17:30:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail11.digital.com (mail11.digital.com [192.208.46.10])
          by who.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) with SMTP id RAA23824
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 17:30:31 -0800
Received: from muggsy.lkg.dec.com by mail11.digital.com (5.65v3.2/1.0/WV)
	id AA31667; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 20:23:56 -0500
Received:  from whydos.lkg.dec.com by muggsy.lkg.dec.com (5.65/DEC-Ultrix/4.3) with SMTP
	id AA26029; Wed, 17 Jan 1996 20:23:54 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by whydos.lkg.dec.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA17385; Thu, 18 Jan 1996 01:31:27 GMT
Message-Id: <199601180131.BAA17385@whydos.lkg.dec.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: whydos.lkg.dec.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Cc: James Robertson <max@underdog.maxie.com>, Robert Withrow <witr@rwwa.com>,
        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Another cool hack with FreeBSD... 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 17 Jan 1996 13:37:31 PST."
             <199601172137.NAA00989@rah.star-gate.com> 
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.5omega 10/6/94
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 01:31:27 +0000
From: Matt Thomas <matt@lkg.dec.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk


In  <199601172137.NAA00989@rah.star-gate.com> , you wrote:

> If memory does not failed me ISO TP4 supported bonding right on
> the stack -- so if anyone is interested on this area I suggest
> this may be a good place to start. ISO TP4 --- I forgot the
> official ISO name however TP4 is  sort of like tcp/ip however it has 
> more control features.

Alas, your memory has failed you.  While TP4 [ISO8073] supports splitting
and recombining, that's for CONS and not CLNS (which is IP like).  This
is not a transport issue but a network/datalink issue.  Multilink PPP is
really what you want to use in this instance.

Matt Thomas                          Internet:   matt@lkg.dec.com
IPv6 Kernel Grunt                    WWW URL:    http://ftp.dec.com/%7Ethomas/
Digital Equipment Corporation        Disclaimer: This message reflects my
Littleton, MA                                    own warped views, etc.