From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Mon Nov 19 05:28:52 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A572C1134CEB for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:28:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32CB582E96 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:28:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DF83F1134CEA; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:28:51 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBCB21134CE9 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:28:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60CC382E91 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:28:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8764316E4 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:28:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id wAJ5SoNH014704 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:28:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id wAJ5SoFx014703 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:28:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 233310] jail.conf system should be modularized to conf.d approach Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:28:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: conf X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: rocky@herveybayaustralia.com.au X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 32CB582E96 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.17 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.29)[0.292,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:10310, ipnet:2001:1900:2254::/48, country:US]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.88)[0.876,0] X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 05:28:53 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233310 Bug ID: 233310 Summary: jail.conf system should be modularized to conf.d approach Product: Base System Version: CURRENT Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: conf Assignee: bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: rocky@herveybayaustralia.com.au The jail.conf system seems to be rather useful in and of itself, but given = the approach of docker, xorg, openldap, and such, shouldn't this be easier to d= rop and replace config like in the conf.d format rather than appending the one = conf file? I believe even rc has this approach available using rc.conf.d system. This would make much more sense given that jails are individual objects in = the system. Individual conf files allow quicker deployment, copy and modify, and updates to the individual jail rather than the whole conf file - especially= by automation tools, where it is likely you'd want better protection to indivi= dual jails rather than bork the lot if something goes sideways if the one conf f= ile is modified. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=