From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 14:18:58 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A408A14E
 for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:18:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DF2080E
 for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:18:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from new-host.home (pool-173-70-85-31.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net
 [173.70.85.31])
 by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E257B91E;
 Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:18:57 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <54B67AD1.5050609@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:18:57 -0500
From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Shane Ambler <FreeBSD@ShaneWare.Biz>, 
 FreeBSD stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Question about sysctl's
References: <54B51FA0.6040307@ShaneWare.Biz>
In-Reply-To: <54B51FA0.6040307@ShaneWare.Biz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 14 Jan 2015 09:18:57 -0500 (EST)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:18:58 -0000

On 1/13/15 8:37 AM, Shane Ambler wrote:
> 
> I am curious about two particular sysctl's, they are described as
> 
> vm.stats.vm.v_wire_count: Wired pages
> vm.max_wired: System-wide limit to wired page count
> 
> Now to me that sounds like v_wire_count should never get higher than
> max_wired, yet today I have a v_wire_count that is ~40% above the
> max_wired.
> 
> vm.stats.vm.v_wire_count: 938417
> vm.max_wired: 662820
> 
> So is this an error or do these two work differently than they appear?

Not all wired allocations are subject to the limit (which isn't obvious
from the description).  Anything that calls 'malloc()' in the kernel
will use wired memory for example, and those generally aren't subject to
the limit.  However, user-initiated operations (like a sysctl buffer or
user pages wired via mlock()) are.

-- 
John Baldwin