From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 9 17:06:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from [127.0.0.1] (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17AE41065672; Wed, 9 Dec 2009 17:06:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 12:06:10 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200912081940.nB8JeLbT054259@repoman.freebsd.org> <20091209103056.78739.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> In-Reply-To: <20091209103056.78739.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200912091206.14957.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/nspluginwrapper-devel Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:06:26 -0000 On Wednesday 09 December 2009 05:30 am, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 07:39:57PM +0000, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > jkim 2009-12-08 19:40:21 UTC > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > www/nspluginwrapper-devel Makefile > > Log: > > Add forgotten LATEST_LINK. > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.17 +2 -0 ports/www/nspluginwrapper-devel/Makefile > > I wonder, why don't we use PACKAGENAMESUFFIX instead of > LATEST_LINK on these cases? Because I don't like nspluginwrapper-devel-1.3.0.tbz. :-) Jung-uk Kim