From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 07:47:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25A2106566B for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:47:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9566B8FC08 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:47:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.101]) by mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9AAAAFC206; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:47:29 -0900 (AKST) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:47:29 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <200901252128.VAA04563@sopwith.solgatos.com> In-Reply-To: <200901252128.VAA04563@sopwith.solgatos.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901252247.29775.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Dieter Subject: Re: swap_pager complaints but not using swap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 07:47:31 -0000 On Sunday 25 January 2009 04:28:47 Dieter wrote: > >>>> AMD64 FreeBSD 7.0 2 GiB main memory > >>>> > So the machine doesn't normally use swap much at all, but messing with > the large ISO apparently kicked something out of memory, and the disk > with the swap partition was already busy writing at the other end of > the disk. > > Do you consider writing a large file to disk a "truly unspeakable" load? Just curious, since you're running 7.0: SCHED_4BSD or SCHED_ULE? And if you have a chance to change it, does the scenario persist? -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part.