From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Aug  7 23:06:43 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7E841065675;
	Thu,  7 Aug 2008 23:06:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BE28FC15;
	Thu,  7 Aug 2008 23:06:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2])
	by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62431207E;
	Fri,  8 Aug 2008 01:06:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 39E2184497; Fri,  8 Aug 2008 01:06:42 +0200 (CEST)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
To: Oleksandr Tymoshenko <gonzo@freebsd.org>
References: <20080729.161303.709402272.imp@bsdimp.com>
	<86r69buar0.fsf@ds4.des.no> <489B08F6.8060605@freebsd.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 01:06:42 +0200
In-Reply-To: <489B08F6.8060605@freebsd.org> (Oleksandr Tymoshenko's message of
	"Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:38:46 +0300")
Message-ID: <867iasfmrh.fsf@ds4.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: kan@freebsd.org, arch@freebsd.org, pjd@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Need a code review
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:06:43 -0000

Oleksandr Tymoshenko <gonzo@freebsd.org> writes:
> openpam detects static modules build using cpp(1) condition:
> #if defined(__GNUC__) && !defined(__PIC__) && !defined(NO_STATIC_MODULES)
> The problem is that gcc MIPS option -mabi-calls assumes -fpic for both
> static and dynamic builds. So the question is: would defining
> NO_STATIC_MODULES for MIPS be enough or it should be addressed
> upstream?

"upstream" in this case means me.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no