From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 14 05:02:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7255316A403 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 05:02:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ota@j.email.ne.jp) Received: from mail.asahi-net.or.jp (mail2.asahi-net.or.jp [202.224.39.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEBD143D58 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 05:02:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ota@j.email.ne.jp) Received: from dynabook.advok.com (pool-151-197-217-80.phil.east.verizon.net [151.197.217.80]) by mail.asahi-net.or.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3181D04B; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 14:02:52 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 01:02:49 -0500 From: Yoshihiro Ota To: kama , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Message-Id: <20060914010249.672ac405.ota@j.email.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <20060913125850.T90966@ns1.as.pvp.se> References: <200609131038.k8DAcpc7068953@lurza.secnetix.de> <20060913125850.T90966@ns1.as.pvp.se> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: 6.2? (fwd) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 05:02:57 -0000 On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:07:20 +0200 (CEST) kama wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Oliver Fromme wrote: > > > > > That's true, and the schedule will most probably change. > > Currently the release is listed for Oct. 9th, but I bet > > that it'll be delayed. > > I disagree, I would like to have an notice about it. Even though it might > not say much. Just a "The code of the stable branch has been freezed due > to the upcomming release of X.Y" > I agree with Kama. I specificly switched once to stable for pre-release testing purpose. I saw email from one of the developers claiming that not many people join pre-release testing. (I do not remember whether it was not many people join BETA testing or RC testing. Anyway, I saw it in one of the quota issue e-mail chain on 6.1-RELEASE.) If we are not in such a stage, I personally prefer to stick with releases.