From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 19:42:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E372C97D for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 19:42:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x235.google.com (mail-qc0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2BD11A9A for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 19:42:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id i17so7410555qcy.26 for ; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 12:42:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=wssrUkocReykAZDX+31++cGr4otf3ERlpCWDPb7V2r0=; b=w4QfZiRUOyyp8Cq/J2VQ8GAUiigoasbQOmFysYr6p58/XjXJunZoLiIrcEZ3J/P2T6 TDrFQ1oQWBNYLWGs8afgs779Wr9ktiBkeFjKJ+uxQu+n+27fTTZVKU7i/eif6/4bq9Kz MYdkoVRNH/pk6D09VcQQWObaqoCn9XDnAby7jxhGL+FSClhT32P0rE9CwETW/wK3znBd 7FJ14rs7WyMoiRz1JdhCIJrmt3cJphFkumyUVbYJsEyTp2ZUXT+eJpQWOqAL312RA3bI zym+lR01DBU2ovY7nGEFutdsIA5SvKkNEq0Co1HXkzjrg7tcZGDnZcg/Vz6mRZLLPzuh g4Bg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.31.75 with SMTP id e69mr36714414qge.2.1409686930799; Tue, 02 Sep 2014 12:42:10 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.39.139 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 12:42:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 12:42:10 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -JCpMaIEROXqIivWO84kHIuRdns Message-ID: Subject: Re: Intel Centrino Wireless-N 2230 status From: Adrian Chadd To: Oliver Pinter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 19:42:12 -0000 Hi, Compile it with IWN_DEBUG, then sysctl dev.iwn.0.debug=0x1 -a On 2 September 2014 12:41, Oliver Pinter wrote: > I not tried freebsd-head yet, but I'm able today. In mode N seems like > the NIC sends only one frame, and no more. > > With tcpdump and/or wlandebug I see only rx packets and no tx. > > If you add some pointer what changes must I create to easier debug, or > what concrete information required, feel free to ping me or send the > details. > > On 9/2/14, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> Cool! Have you tried freebsd-head? Does it work there? >> >> How's it failing in association state? What's it saying? >> >> >> -a >> >> >> On 2 September 2014 12:30, Oliver Pinter wrote: >>> Hi All! >>> >>> After I backported all of the net80211 and iwn changes from 11-CURRENT >>> to 10-STABLE the wireless NIC in subject working on mode G. If I try >>> to use with mode N (ht20, ht40) it failed in association state. >>> >>> All of the backports are in this github repo: >>> >>> https://github.com/opntr/opBSD/commits/op/stable/10-iwn-backport >>> >>> Oliver >>