From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 09:03:36 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996E237B401; Mon, 5 May 2003 09:03:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (12-233-57-131.client.attbi.com [12.233.57.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7969043F93; Mon, 5 May 2003 09:03:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.9/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h45G3YdN007619; Mon, 5 May 2003 09:03:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.9/8.12.5/Submit) id h45G3Ylc007618; Mon, 5 May 2003 09:03:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 09:03:34 -0700 From: David Schultz To: Murray Stokely Message-ID: <20030505160334.GA7551@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mail-Followup-To: Murray Stokely , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <200305042135.h44LZfXW092536@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030505044601.GA4947@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030504215256.E3018@freebsdmall.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030504215256.E3018@freebsdmall.com> cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libutil login.conf.5 X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 16:03:37 -0000 On Sun, May 04, 2003, Murray Stokely wrote: > On Sun, May 04, 2003 at 09:46:01PM -0700, David Schultz wrote: > > > Note that the idletime setting is not enforced. > > > > This is redundant in -CURRENT; nothing in the section under which > > idletime appears is implemented at all, as the section header > > Ok, yes it is redundant in -CURRENT, and I will back it out there. > Any reason not to commit this to RELENG_4? Thanks. Committing it to RELENG_4 is okay as far as I know. Go for it.